*
“No one in their right mind believes that stones can walk.”
“Despite the fact that the Folk-Record is unequivocable on this point.”
“It is also unequivocable about stones dancing, and drinking from streams.”
“I may be able to clarify the streams. They may be underground.”
“They may even be telluric currents, but you promised.”
“That, unfortunately, is deductive reasoning for you. It was the only bit of wall we had not checked.”
“We had so checked it… last time.”
“Only from a distance and that does not count.”
*
*
As it turned out there proved to be another bit of wall we had not checked.
Also distant and too far away to consider once the snow started.
I mean, really started.
There were compensations though, like the trees and the wildlife.
*
*
“Are you sure it isn’t the Throne-Stone?”
“Not near enough to the wall and the gate.”
“But the wall is a mnenomic. Your mind could easily have contracted the distance.”
“Not the right size, or colour.”
“Like that’s not easily accounted for.”
“Maybe you’re right and I’ve discovered a new species of stone, which can walk!”
“But that would be a New-Old species of stone.”
“So perhaps it just went for a stroll, again.”
“What, in the snow?”
“…We did.”
*
Reblogged this on Die Erste Eslarner Zeitung – Aus und über Eslarn, sowie die bayerisch-tschechische Region!.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Michael…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Stuart, for the always wonderful posting. My pleasure to read and reblog. Michael
LikeLiked by 2 people
🙂
LikeLike
And if you did , why not the stone too 💜
LikeLiked by 2 people
Precisely! 😉
LikeLike
🌹
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love conversations like these…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don and Wen seem to spend much of their time embroiled in such exchanges… 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
They are an interesting couple…
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s one way of describing it… 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people